<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SWFAddress plus mod_rewrite = SEO bliss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squidder.com/2008/05/01/swfaddress-plus-mod_rewrite-seo-bliss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squidder.com/2008/05/01/swfaddress-plus-mod_rewrite-seo-bliss/</link>
	<description>Actionscript you'll lose your ink over.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:36:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.squidder.com/2008/05/01/swfaddress-plus-mod_rewrite-seo-bliss/comment-page-1/#comment-5272</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squidder.com/?p=87#comment-5272</guid>
		<description>Hey guys.
I&#039;m investigating the issue of ajax and seo.
SWFAddress looks like a really nice thing for bookmarking and back/forward buttons for ajax sites etc. 

However. As I understand: bots are unable to parse javascript period.

So - in my understanding: bots will only index your home page and no mod/rewrite will ever help. 

Could someone confirm this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys.<br />
I&#8217;m investigating the issue of ajax and seo.<br />
SWFAddress looks like a really nice thing for bookmarking and back/forward buttons for ajax sites etc. </p>
<p>However. As I understand: bots are unable to parse javascript period.</p>
<p>So &#8211; in my understanding: bots will only index your home page and no mod/rewrite will ever help. </p>
<p>Could someone confirm this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvyn</title>
		<link>http://www.squidder.com/2008/05/01/swfaddress-plus-mod_rewrite-seo-bliss/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squidder.com/?p=87#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Hello! 

I did something like that for a simple website not so long ago.
Here is how it works: every page in the Flash site has an xHTML mirror, at the same URL as in the Flash with SWFAddress (just like you explained). The redirection is triggered by a small Flash file embedded with Javascript in the HTML mirror page (so there is no way for a robot to know there is a redirection).
The Flash site then opens at the good page thanks to SWFAddress.
Finally, the Flash site loads the content from the xHTML mirror page, with a special div contaning valid xHTML=XML that you can parse easily with E4X.

Check it out: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aamovible.be
(Disable Javascript to see the source in the mirror pages)

It&#039;s based on my fellow Hans work on a previous site, www.alternativ.be, which uses about the same principle but without SWFAddress http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=3

I just stumbled upon your blog and it seems pretty damn loaded with good stuff :D
Keep it up

-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! </p>
<p>I did something like that for a simple website not so long ago.<br />
Here is how it works: every page in the Flash site has an xHTML mirror, at the same URL as in the Flash with SWFAddress (just like you explained). The redirection is triggered by a small Flash file embedded with Javascript in the HTML mirror page (so there is no way for a robot to know there is a redirection).<br />
The Flash site then opens at the good page thanks to SWFAddress.<br />
Finally, the Flash site loads the content from the xHTML mirror page, with a special div contaning valid xHTML=XML that you can parse easily with E4X.</p>
<p>Check it out: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aamovible.be" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aamovible.be</a><br />
(Disable Javascript to see the source in the mirror pages)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s based on my fellow Hans work on a previous site, <a href="http://www.alternativ.be" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternativ.be</a>, which uses about the same principle but without SWFAddress <a href="http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=3</a></p>
<p>I just stumbled upon your blog and it seems pretty damn loaded with good stuff <img src='http://www.squidder.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Keep it up</p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikih</title>
		<link>http://www.squidder.com/2008/05/01/swfaddress-plus-mod_rewrite-seo-bliss/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squidder.com/?p=87#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Buenos dias!



we are juggling with the same issue in a big project at the moment. We are using typo3 for all the content management and url generation. We are thinking about a solution to display and overall using the hardlink and rewriting it to a softlink for swfaddressing in background. But would that effect the client-side js? mod_rewrite stays behind the server-side ...



solution: disabling request for flash user using the hardlink and retreiving it with &quot;document.location&quot; instead of a &quot;hash&quot; by listening to changes on the location.





How does it work for u guys? Our goal is to use only one url shema for both clients (bot, flash and html).





Cheers

Florian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buenos dias!</p>
<p>we are juggling with the same issue in a big project at the moment. We are using typo3 for all the content management and url generation. We are thinking about a solution to display and overall using the hardlink and rewriting it to a softlink for swfaddressing in background. But would that effect the client-side js? mod_rewrite stays behind the server-side &#8230;</p>
<p>solution: disabling request for flash user using the hardlink and retreiving it with &#8220;document.location&#8221; instead of a &#8220;hash&#8221; by listening to changes on the location.</p>
<p>How does it work for u guys? Our goal is to use only one url shema for both clients (bot, flash and html).</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Florian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
